home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0229>
- <title>
- Feb. 21, 1994: A Very Messy Divorce
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Feb. 21, 1994 The Star-Crossed Olympics
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- BUSINESS, Page 46
- A Very Messy Divorce
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>John Sculley parts ways with Spectrum, leaving a trail of mutual
- recrimination
- </p>
- <p>By John F. Dickerson/Manhasset
- </p>
- <p> On a sunny weekend day last September, John Sculley scribbled
- a note on the screen of his Apple Newton palmtop computer in
- the living room of his Greenwich, Connecticut, home. "Let's
- make Spectrum a world success," he wrote to Peter Caserta, president
- of Spectrum Information Technologies. Caserta and his aides,
- who had come to woo Sculley, then demonstrated how their wireless
- technology could reproduce the scripted message on a fax machine
- a few rooms away. As the fax whirred, the former chairman of
- Apple Computer saw visions of a global wireless revolution and
- his own role in it. "That's when the light bulb went off in
- my head," he remembered. Within weeks, Sculley and Caserta announced
- their corporate betrothal, whereby Sculley would become Spectrum's
- new chief executive, bringing to the marriage the reputation
- of a man who had transformed Apple from an $800 million upstart
- to an $8 billion giant.
- </p>
- <p> Last week the marriage ended as precipitously as it had begun.
- Sculley resigned from Spectrum and filed a $10 million lawsuit
- against Caserta. Two days later, Spectrum countersued for $300
- million.
- </p>
- <p> With a vision he once publicly compared to Barry Diller's plans
- for QVC, Sculley had hoped to parlay the valuable patents of
- the once little-known company into a behemoth befitting a new
- name he dreamed up for Spectrum: Global Wave Communications.
- What was to have been a comeback for the 54-year-old executive,
- who stepped down last June after failing to restart Apple's
- stalled rise, instead poses new questions about his business
- acumen.
- </p>
- <p> Sculley claims that he was hoodwinked and blames Caserta for
- tarnishing his image. His suit charges that Caserta made "fraudulent
- misrepresentations" in order to reap profits on the stock-price
- increase inspired by his hiring. Indeed, Spectrum shares rose
- from 3 1/4 to 11 1/8 on the announcement, and a month later,
- Caserta and two of his top executives cashed in some of their
- options for a reported $13.2 million profit. It was not until
- late last month, says Sculley, that he learned of an eight-month-old
- investigation of the company by the Securities and Exchange
- Commission. Nor did he find out until after becoming chief executive
- that Spectrum had been using aggressive accounting practices
- to report licensing fees. At Sculley's insistence, Spectrum
- recalculated its earnings for the past six months using more
- conservative methods. A restatement, issued just moments before
- his resignation, turned the company's earnings for that period
- from a $1.1 million profit to a $5.3 million loss. "If I had
- been properly informed," said Sculley in a press release, "I
- would not have joined the company."
- </p>
- <p> Caserta denies that he and his colleagues were out to make a
- fast buck, and says Sculley was made aware of their plans to
- sell stock. His company also denies that Sculley was kept in
- the dark about the SEC inquiry, claiming that Spectrum executives
- briefed him at a dinner three days before he signed his employment
- contract.
- </p>
- <p> Caserta and his fellow Spectrum officers are also accusing Sculley
- of concocting his charges as part of a shrewd "exit strategy"
- that would release him from his employment contract. "He wanted
- out. He didn't relate to us. He was like a fish out of water,"
- Caserta told TIME last week. "He needed someone to attack so
- that he could get out of this gracefully."
- </p>
- <p> Spectrum also contends that Sculley's Monday- morning phone
- call to ensure that the restatement of earnings was released
- came five minutes before he announced his resignation. It was
- not, the company says, a final act of fiduciary duty, as Sculley
- claims, but a maneuver to protect himself by covering a potentially
- negative market reaction to his departure with an equally depressing
- earnings report. In record trading volume Monday, Spectrum's
- stock lost more than half of its value--dropping from 5 9/16
- to 2 1/4. At week's end the company's shares, once as high as
- 13 1/8, were trading at 3 3/8.
- </p>
- <p> Sculley's lawyer responded to the Spectrum suit by accusing
- Caserta of "combining shreds of facts with wild, unsubstantiated
- theories to arrive at the version of events he desperately wants
- the world to believe." Sculley claims to have investigated the
- company thoroughly before signing, but his suit suggests otherwise.
- Though rumors of an SEC investigation had been swirling since
- May, Sculley says he took Caserta at his word that there were
- no outstanding "problems" at the company. Also slipping through
- Sculley's inquiries were the aggressive accounting measures
- he lists among his reasons for leaving. The same procedures
- were included in a quarterly report filed before he joined the
- company. Sounding oddly like one of Sculley's detractors at
- Apple, his spokesman conceded, "He paid more attention to the
- patents and technology than the financial stability of the company."
- </p>
- <p> As in most divorces, the courts will take months to sort out
- who did what to whom. Meanwhile, Sculley did manage to make
- an appearance Thursday at Vice President Al Gore's panel on
- the information highway. When it came time to introduce himself,
- he said, "I'm John Sculley, and I don't work for anybody." Given
- his recent troubles, that might just become a permanent answer.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-